Trampoline Systems

* Trampoline Description Here

Trampoline Systems

* Trampoline Description Here


Content

Humans

Trampoline on Trampoline, enterprise social computing, user experience and organisational trends.

Archive for the ‘Conference’ Category

emma

Community vs. Large Scale Barcamps

By Emma Persky on November 3rd, 2008

Before I even consider this, I think my title is ineffectual in actually grasping the differences I want to point out. This comes from a distorted sense of scale we have when it comes to barcamps. What makes a large scale camp large scale? 50 people, 100, 1000? And what makes a community camp community based? The people, the location, the feeling?

Some camps which I would consider very much community based, such as barcampcork are actually quite large (over 100 people), whereas others are much smaller (such as barcampnortheast with around 30 attendees), and yet both maintain a strong community feeling. On the other hand, barcamplondon 3 and 4 (neither of which were attended by significantly more than 100 people), didn’t come close to exuding that sense of community. How ironic that I live in London, and that’s where my local community is. I’m not knocking the London camps for not having that community feeling, I’m not even sure that it is something that organisers can even control, but is drawn out from the people that attend. And in reality, the types of people drawn to barcamplondon and quite different from the people drawn to barcampcork. Almost every attendee at Cork, with the notable exception of myself, has a vested interest in the Cork and wider Ireland geek community, whereas the London attendees either seemed somewhat blasé about the whole barcamp thing (are we that spoilt over here…?), or were in town for the barcamp.

We can also consider super-sized camps such as barcampberlin which I attended a few weeks ago, which was due to be attended by 600 people, and drew somewhere around the 450 mark (my guesstimate). It’s actually quite hard for me to make a comparison with berlin because of the nature of my attendance at the event. I travelled to berlin with a few friends, and very quickly we started hanging out with other Londoners at the event. I don’t believe I spoke to more than 5 local, or even Germany based, attendees throughout the entire event. This came down to the fact that I was very comfortable knowing my 10 friends, and knowing all of their friends, who happened, mostly, to be my friends too, and there was no need to break out from our group. Additionally none of the sessions were in any way discussion group oriented, and so there was no permission to engage with total strangers about mutually interesting topics. This makes it very hard to meet people.

Maybe it all comes down to my social networks at these various events, but I do have a strong suspicion, that this is influenced by the style of event, the type of people attracted to it, and the pre existing connections you go with.  Could Berlin have been made as warm and welcoming at Cork? Probably not, but simply because the logistics of making an event that large work on a small community scale are virtually impossible. What about London? I think engaging the community in organisation would have been a big win. There was a feeling of isolation between the organisation of the camp and it’s attendees, which somewhat undermines some of the core principles. Ultimately I think any barcamp has the potential to feel “just right,” but the parameters for this kind of success don’t always lend themselves to “popular” destination such as Berlin and London.

All that said, I’d love to organise a community based barcamplondon. Who want’s to join me?

mike

Tapping the Mainline at SXSW

By Mike Stenhouse on August 20th, 2008

I’ve always meant to go to SXSW. Next year I just might make it. My proposal made it to the Panel Picker stage, which is nice, but with the popularity contest now well and truly afoot I should probably have a go at getting the word out. So:

Tapping the Mainline: Designing for Learned and Evolved Responses
We love stories, recognise patterns in fractions of a second and have a set of highly developed social behaviours. In this talk Mike will be running through a collection of these hard-wired influence points and exploring how they can be used in the design of products, interfaces and experiences.
http://panelpicker.sxsw.com/ideas/view/1144

And while I’m about it I might as well have a bit of a poke at the process…

The Panel Picker seems like a good way to engage with the conference audience but I can’t help thinking that the execution is lacking. There are currently some 1,273 proposals in the mix. That’s an awful lot of reading for anyone wishing to participate. With that sort of volume I really wish they’d put more thought into the desired outcome: unbiased participation, which will involve discovery, weighing and rating in volume.

My main problem with the Panel Picker interface is the clunky tabular layout. The addition of keyboard shortcuts is a fantastic addition but I need to read the title, summary and maybe name to reach any sort of informed rating decision. There just isn’t enough horizontal real-estate available for all that in a single row. Why not have a Hot-or-Not style view? Let me focus on one thing at a time and make it as painless as possible to contribute? Or just break the title and summary onto separate lines?

I also feel that the 1-5 scoring system is unnecessarily complex. How can I judge the quality of a proposal to that sort of accuracy from 50 words? A yardstick of interest is all that’s required and with 1,000+ proposals to get through speed and ease should be the highest priority. I’d go with a simple thumbs up/thumbs down widget.

Anyway, them’s the breaks! Tapping the Mainline is version 2 of the Ego to Ergo talk I gave (and thoroughly enjoyed) at SkillSwap last month.  If you’d like to hear it, go give me a rating.